Sürekli tapınma yaratıcıyı sıkmıyor mu? Tapınma anlayışı nereden kaynaklı - Ra an
Wynn: Thank you. I have a question from Cameron in Memphis, Tennessee.
We asked the question to the Elohim about worship. That question is
answered in the Creator God Book, where it was said the Elohim really
didn’t like worship, that worship created a separation that the essence
of the answer was that the Elohim was really a higher aspect of us and
we’re a lower aspect of them but in the Law of One we’re all the same
energy; worship creates separation. Cameron is asking about The One Infinite Creator. There’s a
concept that goes into people’s minds—this is me making me a
comment—maybe The One Infinite Creator is greater than the Elohim. Maybe
the one infinite Creator likes being worshipped.
Cameron’s question is: Does the one infinite Creator also find it irksome to be worshipped as well?
Ra’An: The One Infinite Creator is a part and parcel of everything. It is our view that The One Infinite Creator has the ability to love and to create and to destroy and that The One Infinite Creator is infinite love in the manifestations and in the connection with the All That Is in manifestation and loves dearly all of its creatures.
The One Infinite Creator is a part and parcel of the essence of everything and is loving for all of its creatures. We feel in that is the answer: that it has no separation between all of its parts and so it cannot like to be worshipped, because worship means that there is a separation between the worshipper and worshipped. There is no separation between The One Infinite Creator and all of its parts.
Does that answer the question?
Wynn: I think it does. How the idea of worship come about, which is so prevalent in all religions?
Ra’An: One of the ways it came about was that, in say, the Jewish religion, times were very hard. It was very hard to make a life, to have the crops grow bountifully every year. Things were very hard. One would interiorize into the planting season and would feel separated from the rain and would then begin to ask that rain come, then put themselves on the line, asking that they could have a better life, an easier life and that things could come easier. If they would do this or that, or sacrifice, or do something else, maybe things would come easier.
When one is in the third density there is a duality; there is the necessity to make a living. There are the elements, which seem sometimes difficult and hard to overcome. So the individuals place themselves in a lower category than some of the elements or some of the things they saw as the power to make things go right, to make the rain come. They would not know what to do. They began to feel that they were not as competent as say, the forces that could come and bring rain, that they had to be dependent.
By having to be dependent, they began to consider that there was something greater that they were dependent upon. They began to make supplication to them, to make worship as if they were not as worthy or as good.
They felt that maybe, if they did something wrong, then this would bring disaster upon their community, because they saw within their own life if someone in the community was derelict that it made it very hard for everyone because it was so hard to survive in some of the circumstances people found themselves in.
Does that shed some light on it?
Wynn: Yes, it does. Thank you so much. Next question:
Oh, let me ask one more question about that particular question:
Was there a particular agenda of the negative to create worship as a way of causing people to disempower themselves?
Ra’An: Give us a moment.
There was an agenda of the negative at various times to disempower people, to make their lives more difficult and to attempt to enslave them, to bring more goods and more survival to some of the negative—negative priests, at various times, negative groups—that would follow the idea of one of the leaders of their group and feel that was the necessary protocol, that the warlords would run over the country and take the farms in a search for power and strength.
So, there was the pre-disposition of certain negative individuals. Sometimes they had a goal that they felt was important that they take over another country so their country could have enough to eat, or for other reasons.
Wynn: Thank you.
Cameron’s question is: Does the one infinite Creator also find it irksome to be worshipped as well?
Ra’An: The One Infinite Creator is a part and parcel of everything. It is our view that The One Infinite Creator has the ability to love and to create and to destroy and that The One Infinite Creator is infinite love in the manifestations and in the connection with the All That Is in manifestation and loves dearly all of its creatures.
The One Infinite Creator is a part and parcel of the essence of everything and is loving for all of its creatures. We feel in that is the answer: that it has no separation between all of its parts and so it cannot like to be worshipped, because worship means that there is a separation between the worshipper and worshipped. There is no separation between The One Infinite Creator and all of its parts.
Does that answer the question?
Wynn: I think it does. How the idea of worship come about, which is so prevalent in all religions?
Ra’An: One of the ways it came about was that, in say, the Jewish religion, times were very hard. It was very hard to make a life, to have the crops grow bountifully every year. Things were very hard. One would interiorize into the planting season and would feel separated from the rain and would then begin to ask that rain come, then put themselves on the line, asking that they could have a better life, an easier life and that things could come easier. If they would do this or that, or sacrifice, or do something else, maybe things would come easier.
When one is in the third density there is a duality; there is the necessity to make a living. There are the elements, which seem sometimes difficult and hard to overcome. So the individuals place themselves in a lower category than some of the elements or some of the things they saw as the power to make things go right, to make the rain come. They would not know what to do. They began to feel that they were not as competent as say, the forces that could come and bring rain, that they had to be dependent.
By having to be dependent, they began to consider that there was something greater that they were dependent upon. They began to make supplication to them, to make worship as if they were not as worthy or as good.
They felt that maybe, if they did something wrong, then this would bring disaster upon their community, because they saw within their own life if someone in the community was derelict that it made it very hard for everyone because it was so hard to survive in some of the circumstances people found themselves in.
Does that shed some light on it?
Wynn: Yes, it does. Thank you so much. Next question:
Oh, let me ask one more question about that particular question:
Was there a particular agenda of the negative to create worship as a way of causing people to disempower themselves?
Ra’An: Give us a moment.
There was an agenda of the negative at various times to disempower people, to make their lives more difficult and to attempt to enslave them, to bring more goods and more survival to some of the negative—negative priests, at various times, negative groups—that would follow the idea of one of the leaders of their group and feel that was the necessary protocol, that the warlords would run over the country and take the farms in a search for power and strength.
So, there was the pre-disposition of certain negative individuals. Sometimes they had a goal that they felt was important that they take over another country so their country could have enough to eat, or for other reasons.
Wynn: Thank you.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder